<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Dharma Forum - All Forums]]></title>
		<link>http://www.dharmaforum.com/forum/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Dharma Forum - http://www.dharmaforum.com/forum]]></description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 06:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>MyBB</generator>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Desire and the object of desire]]></title>
			<link>http://www.dharmaforum.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=68</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:04:50 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dharmaforum.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=68</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
I think it can be useful academically to consider that desire (at least in Hindu philosophy) exists as something in it own right. By this I mean that desire is different to that which is desired i.e. the object. This helps us to understand desire as something concerete that we can do something with or about.<br />
<br />
For example, sexual desire is still desire. As is desire for warmth, a well paid job (money) or any other desire. Desire itself has a certain taste or flavour, which can be recognised through thought e.g. I feel the need for sex/food/money/parties. <br />
<br />
The point here then is that when we are warned that desire will limit our perception of the Divine or hold us back on the path of enlightenment, the issue is not the object e.g. sex/money/fiesta, but the fact that desire has arisen and we are already <span style="font-style: italic;">acting</span> to satisfy that desire.<br />
<br />
A key word above is “acting”, as much of the Bhagavad Gita is about action and knowledge. All action is founded in knowledge, because action follows thoughts or at least our attitudes. If we change the attitudes or knowledge then we start to change the actions. Instead of acting on desire we can start to become aware of desire and this is the first step towards self-mastery and ultimately spiritual liberation and enlightenment.<br />
<br />
Thoughts?<br />
<br />
Is it really possible to catch desire in us, regardless of what we desire?<br />
Is it really possible to not act on desire?<br />
</span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<span style="font-size: large;"><br />
I think it can be useful academically to consider that desire (at least in Hindu philosophy) exists as something in it own right. By this I mean that desire is different to that which is desired i.e. the object. This helps us to understand desire as something concerete that we can do something with or about.<br />
<br />
For example, sexual desire is still desire. As is desire for warmth, a well paid job (money) or any other desire. Desire itself has a certain taste or flavour, which can be recognised through thought e.g. I feel the need for sex/food/money/parties. <br />
<br />
The point here then is that when we are warned that desire will limit our perception of the Divine or hold us back on the path of enlightenment, the issue is not the object e.g. sex/money/fiesta, but the fact that desire has arisen and we are already <span style="font-style: italic;">acting</span> to satisfy that desire.<br />
<br />
A key word above is “acting”, as much of the Bhagavad Gita is about action and knowledge. All action is founded in knowledge, because action follows thoughts or at least our attitudes. If we change the attitudes or knowledge then we start to change the actions. Instead of acting on desire we can start to become aware of desire and this is the first step towards self-mastery and ultimately spiritual liberation and enlightenment.<br />
<br />
Thoughts?<br />
<br />
Is it really possible to catch desire in us, regardless of what we desire?<br />
Is it really possible to not act on desire?<br />
</span>]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The line between Hindu and non-Hindu]]></title>
			<link>http://www.dharmaforum.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=64</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 02:11:18 -0600</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dharmaforum.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=64</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Where is the line between Hindu and non-Hindu?<br />
<br />
Should we consider nastika movements as non-Hindu or Hindu?<br />
Are Carvaka Hindu?<br />
Mimamsa?<br />
<br />
If so, what makes them Hindu and not Buddhists or Sikhs?<br />
<br />
Or are none of them?<br />
<br />
<br />
Is Indian Folk Religion a part of Hinduism?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Where is the line between Hindu and non-Hindu?<br />
<br />
Should we consider nastika movements as non-Hindu or Hindu?<br />
Are Carvaka Hindu?<br />
Mimamsa?<br />
<br />
If so, what makes them Hindu and not Buddhists or Sikhs?<br />
<br />
Or are none of them?<br />
<br />
<br />
Is Indian Folk Religion a part of Hinduism?]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Incorporating Abrahamic figures into the Dharmic]]></title>
			<link>http://www.dharmaforum.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=60</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 11:20:09 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dharmaforum.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=60</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[How good an idea--if at all--is it to incorporate Abrahamic figures into Dharmic worship?<br />
<br />
For example, the incorporation of Jesus into Vaiṣṇavism and Buddhism, or the incorporation of Yahweh into Śaivism as an aspect of Śiva? Or even -- the incorporation of Allah as a god of Buddhism, or as the same as the Void of Buddhism?<br />
<br />
Can such things work? Are they even possible to reconcile the Dharmic and the adharmic?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[How good an idea--if at all--is it to incorporate Abrahamic figures into Dharmic worship?<br />
<br />
For example, the incorporation of Jesus into Vaiṣṇavism and Buddhism, or the incorporation of Yahweh into Śaivism as an aspect of Śiva? Or even -- the incorporation of Allah as a god of Buddhism, or as the same as the Void of Buddhism?<br />
<br />
Can such things work? Are they even possible to reconcile the Dharmic and the adharmic?]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[How to make Buddhism practical?]]></title>
			<link>http://www.dharmaforum.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=59</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:41:57 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dharmaforum.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=59</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Any tips on how to practice Buddhism when not meditating?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Any tips on how to practice Buddhism when not meditating?]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[bhakti marga ]]></title>
			<link>http://www.dharmaforum.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=58</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2011 15:14:13 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dharmaforum.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=58</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[dear prabhus , <br />
<br />
I would be very interested to hear your thoughts on the subject of bhakti , <br />
<br />
Bhakti Marga  , the path of loving devotion ,<br />
<br />
it would appear to me that it exists in all faiths ,  <br />
but I would very much like to hear what it means  to you ? <br />
<br />
namaskars    .... ratikala]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[dear prabhus , <br />
<br />
I would be very interested to hear your thoughts on the subject of bhakti , <br />
<br />
Bhakti Marga  , the path of loving devotion ,<br />
<br />
it would appear to me that it exists in all faiths ,  <br />
but I would very much like to hear what it means  to you ? <br />
<br />
namaskars    .... ratikala]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Geeta Ashram  - does anyone know it?]]></title>
			<link>http://www.dharmaforum.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=57</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 04:15:22 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dharmaforum.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=57</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[What do you know about the Geeta Ashram. They seem to have established themselves in most countries, but I have not seen or read anything about them beyond their own web sites e.g. <a href="http://geetamalaysia.org/" target="_blank">http://geetamalaysia.org/</a><br />
<br />
Do you know anything more or have any experience with the Geeta Ashrams?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[What do you know about the Geeta Ashram. They seem to have established themselves in most countries, but I have not seen or read anything about them beyond their own web sites e.g. <a href="http://geetamalaysia.org/" target="_blank">http://geetamalaysia.org/</a><br />
<br />
Do you know anything more or have any experience with the Geeta Ashrams?]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Hare Krishna!]]></title>
			<link>http://www.dharmaforum.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=56</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 03:37:15 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dharmaforum.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=56</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[<span style="font-size: medium;">Hello there!<br />
<br />
My internet alias is Gaura Priya... you may remember me with other aliases such as Royal Falcon of God, as well as Shuddha Bhakta.<br />
<br />
I am an explorer and questioner of Sanatana Dharma. I come from the Gaudiya Vaishnava sect, primarily from SCS Math (Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Math) and now in ISKCON, but I currently am still learning, questioning and reading.<br />
<br />
I consider myself a Vaishnava, but albeit a bit liberal.<br />
<br />
Hello! <img src="images/smilies/angel.gif" style="vertical-align: middle;" border="0" alt="Angel" title="Angel" /></span>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<span style="font-size: medium;">Hello there!<br />
<br />
My internet alias is Gaura Priya... you may remember me with other aliases such as Royal Falcon of God, as well as Shuddha Bhakta.<br />
<br />
I am an explorer and questioner of Sanatana Dharma. I come from the Gaudiya Vaishnava sect, primarily from SCS Math (Sri Chaitanya Saraswat Math) and now in ISKCON, but I currently am still learning, questioning and reading.<br />
<br />
I consider myself a Vaishnava, but albeit a bit liberal.<br />
<br />
Hello! <img src="images/smilies/angel.gif" style="vertical-align: middle;" border="0" alt="Angel" title="Angel" /></span>]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[When does ahiṃsā become hiṃsā?]]></title>
			<link>http://www.dharmaforum.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=55</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2011 07:02:39 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dharmaforum.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=55</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[As the title says, when does ahiṃsā become hiṃsā? When is it violent to remain non-violent, if it ever is?<br />
<br />
Is it less violent to resist an evil man, or does violence breed only violence?<br />
<br />
Can non-violence be taken <span style="font-style: italic;">too</span> far?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[As the title says, when does ahiṃsā become hiṃsā? When is it violent to remain non-violent, if it ever is?<br />
<br />
Is it less violent to resist an evil man, or does violence breed only violence?<br />
<br />
Can non-violence be taken <span style="font-style: italic;">too</span> far?]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Mahāyāna and Vajrayāna: the same school, or different schools?]]></title>
			<link>http://www.dharmaforum.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=54</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2011 06:57:19 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dharmaforum.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=54</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Do you separate Mahāyāna and Vajrayāna into two different lineage groups, or do you consider Vajrayāna to be a subset of Mahāyāna as opposed to an independent lineage?<br />
<br />
And of course, why?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Do you separate Mahāyāna and Vajrayāna into two different lineage groups, or do you consider Vajrayāna to be a subset of Mahāyāna as opposed to an independent lineage?<br />
<br />
And of course, why?]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Shingon: Mahāyāna or Vajrayāna?]]></title>
			<link>http://www.dharmaforum.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=53</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2011 06:56:02 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dharmaforum.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=53</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Do you consider Japanese Shingon Buddhism to be closer to the Vajrayāna or Mahāyāna lineage?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Do you consider Japanese Shingon Buddhism to be closer to the Vajrayāna or Mahāyāna lineage?]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[How do you deal with the hassle?]]></title>
			<link>http://www.dharmaforum.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=52</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2011 06:52:03 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dharmaforum.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=52</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[How do you deal with the anti-theistic attitude of some Buddhists, who refuse to believe in existence of Self, and of God?<br />
<br />
Do you debate with them, explain your view, ignore them, or something else?<br />
<br />
How often have you encountered it? Is it predominantly from Westerners, or "intellectuals", or another group, or something else?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[How do you deal with the anti-theistic attitude of some Buddhists, who refuse to believe in existence of Self, and of God?<br />
<br />
Do you debate with them, explain your view, ignore them, or something else?<br />
<br />
How often have you encountered it? Is it predominantly from Westerners, or "intellectuals", or another group, or something else?]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA["Never call a Sikh by his half name."]]></title>
			<link>http://www.dharmaforum.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=51</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 08:56:07 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dharmaforum.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=51</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Chardi Kala<br />
What is a Sikh's "half name"?<br />
<br />
"xxix. Never call a Sikh by his half name."<br />
<br />
Source: <a href="http://www.searchsikhism.com/hind4.html" target="_blank">http://www.searchsikhism.com/hind4.html</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Chardi Kala<br />
What is a Sikh's "half name"?<br />
<br />
"xxix. Never call a Sikh by his half name."<br />
<br />
Source: <a href="http://www.searchsikhism.com/hind4.html" target="_blank">http://www.searchsikhism.com/hind4.html</a>]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Siddhis - your opinion, research or experience please]]></title>
			<link>http://www.dharmaforum.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=50</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 02:52:13 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dharmaforum.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=50</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Generally speaking siddhis are powers that come through spritual practice. I quote wikipedia:<br />
<span style="color: #000080;"><br />
There is the concept of the Ashta Siddhi (eight siddhis) in Hinduism. These are:<br />
Aṇimā: reducing one's body even to the size of an atom<br />
Mahima: expanding one's body to an infinitely large size<br />
Garima: becoming infinitely heavy<br />
Laghima: becoming almost weightless<br />
Prāpti: having unrestricted access to all places<br />
Prākāmya: realizing whatever one desires<br />
Iṣṭva: possessing absolute lordship;<br />
Vaśtva: the power to subjugate all.[5]</span><br />
<br />
I would be interested in your opinion or experience or research on these please?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Generally speaking siddhis are powers that come through spritual practice. I quote wikipedia:<br />
<span style="color: #000080;"><br />
There is the concept of the Ashta Siddhi (eight siddhis) in Hinduism. These are:<br />
Aṇimā: reducing one's body even to the size of an atom<br />
Mahima: expanding one's body to an infinitely large size<br />
Garima: becoming infinitely heavy<br />
Laghima: becoming almost weightless<br />
Prāpti: having unrestricted access to all places<br />
Prākāmya: realizing whatever one desires<br />
Iṣṭva: possessing absolute lordship;<br />
Vaśtva: the power to subjugate all.[5]</span><br />
<br />
I would be interested in your opinion or experience or research on these please?]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Enlightenment in Pure Land Buddhism]]></title>
			<link>http://www.dharmaforum.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=49</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 07:18:25 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dharmaforum.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=49</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Am I correct that a person cannot be enlightened in this life but must go to the Pure Land when they die?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Am I correct that a person cannot be enlightened in this life but must go to the Pure Land when they die?]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[No need for religious doctrine.]]></title>
			<link>http://www.dharmaforum.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=48</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 05:04:43 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dharmaforum.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=48</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[What is your personal understanding or opinion on this verse, please? Does it mean it mean that the Lord's blessings remove the need for any religious doctrine or does it mean Sikhism is the only doctrine needed?<br />
<br />
My opinion is that the Lord removes all doctrine, regardless of name because the Lord is eternally true, beyond time and place.<br />
<br />
Perhaps the Gurmukhi can be understand differently to the English translation?<br />
<br />
<span style="color: #0000CD;">ਜਾ ਕੈ ਰਾਸਿ ਸਰਬ ਸੁਖ ਸੁਆਮੀ ਆਨ ਨ ਮਾਨਤ ਭੇਖਾ  ॥ <br />
जा कै रासि सरब सुख सुआमी आन न मानत भेखा ॥ <br />
Jā kai rās sarab sukẖ su▫āmī ān na mānaṯ bẖekẖā. <br />
One who is blessed with the wealth of our Lord and Master, the Embodiment of Peace, does not believe in any other religious doctrine.</span><br />
<br />
Link: <a href="http://www.srigranth.org/servlet/gurbani.gurbani?Action=Page&amp;g=1&amp;h=1&amp;r=1&amp;t=1&amp;p=0&amp;k=0&amp;Param=1221" target="_blank">http://www.srigranth.org/servlet/gurbani...Param=1221</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[What is your personal understanding or opinion on this verse, please? Does it mean it mean that the Lord's blessings remove the need for any religious doctrine or does it mean Sikhism is the only doctrine needed?<br />
<br />
My opinion is that the Lord removes all doctrine, regardless of name because the Lord is eternally true, beyond time and place.<br />
<br />
Perhaps the Gurmukhi can be understand differently to the English translation?<br />
<br />
<span style="color: #0000CD;">ਜਾ ਕੈ ਰਾਸਿ ਸਰਬ ਸੁਖ ਸੁਆਮੀ ਆਨ ਨ ਮਾਨਤ ਭੇਖਾ  ॥ <br />
जा कै रासि सरब सुख सुआमी आन न मानत भेखा ॥ <br />
Jā kai rās sarab sukẖ su▫āmī ān na mānaṯ bẖekẖā. <br />
One who is blessed with the wealth of our Lord and Master, the Embodiment of Peace, does not believe in any other religious doctrine.</span><br />
<br />
Link: <a href="http://www.srigranth.org/servlet/gurbani.gurbani?Action=Page&amp;g=1&amp;h=1&amp;r=1&amp;t=1&amp;p=0&amp;k=0&amp;Param=1221" target="_blank">http://www.srigranth.org/servlet/gurbani...Param=1221</a>]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Promoting Dharma - Should we do more?]]></title>
			<link>http://www.dharmaforum.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=47</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 03:37:40 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dharmaforum.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=47</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Should we do more to promote Dharma e.g. Sanatana Dharma (Hindu Dharma)?<br />
<br />
What are your thoughts? Are there risks or would the benefit outweigh any issues?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Should we do more to promote Dharma e.g. Sanatana Dharma (Hindu Dharma)?<br />
<br />
What are your thoughts? Are there risks or would the benefit outweigh any issues?]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[How do you know you are a Hindu or Sanatana Dharma?]]></title>
			<link>http://www.dharmaforum.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=46</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2011 02:26:46 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dharmaforum.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=46</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[How do you know in yourself that this religion is the one for you and not another one? How would you decide?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[How do you know in yourself that this religion is the one for you and not another one? How would you decide?]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[IsmailaGodHasHeard.]]></title>
			<link>http://www.dharmaforum.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=45</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 23:52:37 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dharmaforum.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=45</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Hello, my name is Ismaila. I am a Christian and I love to learn. If you want to know more about me, just ask.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Hello, my name is Ismaila. I am a Christian and I love to learn. If you want to know more about me, just ask.]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Is it possible to separate religion and culture?]]></title>
			<link>http://www.dharmaforum.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=44</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 14:04:51 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dharmaforum.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=44</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Is it possible to separate Dharmic religion and cultures from one another?<br />
<br />
<br />
Will we ever see a Western interpretation of Dharmic religions (excluding that ugly and sucky Westernized form of Buddhism <img src="images/smilies/tongue.gif" style="vertical-align: middle;" border="0" alt="Tongue" title="Tongue" />), using Western culture, traditions, language and norms, or will Sanatāna Dharma and Sikh Dharma always be Indian culture centric?<br />
<br />
<br />
What are your thoughts?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Is it possible to separate Dharmic religion and cultures from one another?<br />
<br />
<br />
Will we ever see a Western interpretation of Dharmic religions (excluding that ugly and sucky Westernized form of Buddhism <img src="images/smilies/tongue.gif" style="vertical-align: middle;" border="0" alt="Tongue" title="Tongue" />), using Western culture, traditions, language and norms, or will Sanatāna Dharma and Sikh Dharma always be Indian culture centric?<br />
<br />
<br />
What are your thoughts?]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA["Hindu Prayer book"]]></title>
			<link>http://www.dharmaforum.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=42</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 09:30:42 -0500</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dharmaforum.com/forum/showthread.php?tid=42</guid>
			<description><![CDATA[Link to a Hindu Prayer book: <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/shashikgp/hindu-prayer-book-in-english" target="_blank">http://www.slideshare.net/shashikgp/hind...in-english</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Link to a Hindu Prayer book: <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/shashikgp/hindu-prayer-book-in-english" target="_blank">http://www.slideshare.net/shashikgp/hind...in-english</a>]]></content:encoded>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
